We are coming to the time of year when flies are always a concern, however this year more than in the past as with visits limited to once a day in most cases, fly control can become an issue. This is even more of a worry for those whose horses are afflicted by sweet itch which is a horrible condition and distressing for both the horse and the owner in differing ways.
In most cases within the range of a naturally free horse there will be a grazing area, some form of shelter, a source of water and an area of shade where horses congregate to avoid the ferocity of biting flies1 and in most cases we would try to improve on this for our own horses. However, domestication of the wild horse has resulted in many changes to the horse’s natural behaviour since challenges such as supply of food, shelter and protection have been overcome through modern management practises2. Yet, survey data from the UK suggests that approximately 30% and 55% of horses are kept entirely outside during Spring and Summer respectively, therefore reducing their access to shelters3. Unfortunately, these times that horses are less well sheltered also correlates with an increased prevalence of biting insects4. When horses cannot escape biting insects this has a direct impact on their foraging behaviour changing the frequency and timing of grazing activity5. This is a major concern in 2020 as many livery yards have requested 24/7 turnout and if you are only able to visit once a day how can you protect your horse or pony from flies?
Flies affect most horses and ponies, and their owners! However why are flies such a problematic insect to the equine? It has long been understood that bites from insects are not just an annoyance but in certain circumstances can cause allergic dermatitis on the horse’s skin commonly referred to as sweet itch6. Horses with sweet itch can acquire secondary infections due to the broken skin7 which may result in veterinary treatment, usually by rubbing the affected area, and this can be distressing for the horse but also the owner, but how do the insects know where the animal is? Biting insects do not visually seek out their next blood meal, instead they rely on chemical signals detected via a sense of smell8. These chemical signals include carbon dioxide (animals’ breath), ammonia (urine/faeces), ketones (sweat) and phenols (sweat)8 which explains why flies are attracted all over the horse.
In order to minimise the effect of biting flies, different management strategies can be adopted including stabling during risk periods i.e. dawn and dusk, utilising fly sheets or rugs that prevent flies landing on the horse or using fly sprays9. Stabling is a very useful technique, but in lockdown conditions may be difficult for some people to achieve this year. Fly rugs can be very effective as long as you don’t have a ‘rug thug’ but fly sprays are effective only when applied regularly, and once a day may not be enough to be effective in 24/7 turnout.
An alternative approach is to use nutrition to help. Garlic, Allium sativum, is a herb with a pungent odour that has been utilised by humans for centuries10. Consuming garlic can have the unsocial effect of odorous perspiration within humans11 and the effect is also seen in livestock species, including horses. Despite there being no published evidence on the efficacy of garlic as a natural insect repellent, anecdotal evidence suggests animals consuming garlic for a sustained period of time are bothered less by biting flies. It is believed that the odour associated with consuming garlic masks the chemical signals given off by the horse and makes them less ‘visible’ in terms of smell to biting insects.
There is a lot of concern in regarding feeding horses and the formation of Heinz body anaemia (HBA)12. Care must be taken when interpreting the level of garlic fed and the formation of HBA. Most studies on HBA report the level of garlic as mg/kg or g/kg and at levels of >0.2 g/kg formation of HBA occurs in horses offered this level in two daily feeds12. This low level can appear scary to many horse owners who might offer a 25 ml scoop of garlic granules within the feed leading to concern over toxicity of garlic. However, when carefully examining these links between garlic and HBA the actual levels become clear and are actually mg or g/kg/body weight resulting in the level of 0.2 g/kg being a daily allocation of 200 g of raw garlic for a 500 kg horse, a level grossly over that of feeding guidelines of commercial supplements or a product such as Horslyx Garlic Balancer.
Horslyx Garlic Balancer contains pure garlic oil to help provide a natural, effective and long-lasting way to help combat the problem of biting insects. Linseed oil and antioxidants are also added to help support the immune system and skin condition alongside the high specification balancer package to balance the nutrient deficiencies in forage and grazing. The free access lick promotes a natural trickle feeding pattern that allows the horse to self-regulate and consume Horslyx as and when they need it. This leads to the diet being balanced plus a supply of garlic being available round the clock and so the fly deterrent properties of Horslyx Garlic Balancer are not reliant on a person visiting once daily, but are simply present 24 hours a day to help reduce the irritation from flies and other biting insects.
Independent research, using Horslyx Garlic Balancer, conducted at Aberystwyth University reported that horses offered Horslyx Garlic Balancer had 64.5% less landing on them compared to control, unsupplemented, horses. A follow up study with horses who were already showing symptoms of sweet itch resulted in horses offered Horslyx Garlic Balancer spending less time on behaviours associated with sweet itch relief compared to unsupplemented horses. This research concluded: “Feeding Horslyx Garlic Balancer helped to alleviate irritation caused by sweet itch, which in turn may reduce stress, making for a happier, more responsive and co-operative horse”.
Horslyx Garlic Balancer is available in 650g, 5kg and 15kg tubs with 80kg Garlic available to order. For more information please visit www.horslyx.com.
Telephone Number: 016973 32592
1 Duncan, P. and Vinge, N. (1979) The effect of group size in horses on the rate of attacks by bloodsucking flies. Animal Behaviour 27, 623–625.
2 Cooper, J.J. and Albentosa, M.J., 2005. Behavioural adaptation in the domestic horse: potential role of apparently abnormal responses including stereotypic bArticleehaviour. Livestock Production Science, 92, 177-182.
3 Hotchkiss, J.W., Reid, S.W.J. and Christley, R.M., 2007. A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: Horse demographic characteristics and management. Equine veterinary journal, 39, 294-300.
4 McElligott, P.E. and Galloway, T.D., 1991. Seasonal distribution and parity of host-seeking horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae) from a pasture near Seven Sisters, Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist, 123(2), pp.361-370.
5 Mayes, E. and Duncan, P., 1986. Temporal patterns of feeding behaviour in free-ranging horses. Behaviour, 96(1-2), pp.105-129.
6 Mellor, P.S. and McCaig, J., 1974. The probable cause of” sweet itch” in England. Veterinary Record, 95(18), pp.411-415.
7 Schaffartzik, A., Hamza, E., Janda, J., Crameri, R., Marti, E. and Rhyner, C., 2012. Equine insect bite hypersensitivity: what do we know?. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 147(3-4), pp.113-126.
8 Logan, J.G. and Birkett, M.A., 2007. Semiochemicals for biting fly control: their identification and exploitation. Pest Management Science, 63(7), pp.647-657.
9 Rendle, D., 2014. Managing insect bite hypersensitivity in horses. Livestock, 19(5), pp.304-308.
10 Rivlin, R.S., 2001. Historical perspective on the use of garlic. The Journal of nutrition, 131(3), pp.951S-954S.
11 Doty, R. L. (1981) Olfactory communication in humans. Chemical Senses, 6, 351-376.
12 Pearson, W., Boermans, H.J., Bettger, W.J., McBride, B.W. and Lindinger, M.I., 2005. Association of maximum voluntary dietary intake of freeze-dried garlic with Heinz body anemia in horses. American journal of veterinary research, 66(3), pp.457-465.